This isn’t necessarily a reply to the first post here but I could not figure out how to make this post stand on its own so I’m putting it as a quick reply.
Though Husain begins his review with an example of the effects of 9/11 on Islamophobia, he does not limit himself to the time period that begins in 2001 and continues to today. It is a socio-historical study of Islamophobia through a long History that can help us characterize why Islamophobia shares many similarities to any other form or racism, despite being by definition, and by definition only, not associated to the concept of race. To understand why, we need to look first at the terrible practical aspect of this association that Junaid Raina puts forth. Rana writes “notions of racialized Muslims were placed on African slaves as enslavement was justified through a process of benevolent domination”. Through this, there is a clear association between race and Islam that is created in the process of the establishment of a rapport of strength. If we can understand this attempt at creating a superiority through this association, we can easily comprehend why Islamophobia has become another form of racism. A generalization of a whole population, which regroups Berbers of Morocco, Arabs of the Golf, or Pakistanis and Indians, under the banner of Islam, wether the individuals or even societies of this group are Muslim or not, has facilitated the development of a racial domination for whites. This includes on a national scale such as racial disparities in the United States, or on a more global scale in the establishment of North-South schism. As Husain explains through the anecdote of the Arab Slayer after 9/11, this creates a widespread stigma on this entire population group despite having no true association. To summarize, Islamophobia has grown to become more than a distrust, hatred or discrimation against a certain religion, but rather has become so entangled with the notion of race that it is as much a form of racism as anti-African or anti-Asian racism.