Skip to content

Continuous Journey

Punjabis of the Pacific Coast, 1899-

44 Topics 49 Posts
Refresh the page if the discussion post prompt has not loaded here.
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    No one has replied
  • Polygamy/Polyamory

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3 Views
    No one has replied
  • Requesting a pass

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    No one has replied
  • Western American views of Punjabis

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    11 Views
    A

    Anya, your analysis effectively highlights the intersection of racism and sexism in Western American society's treatment of Punjabis, particularly when it came to relationships with white women. The focus on the "strongest prejudices" against these relationships underscores how they were perceived as a direct threat to deeply entrenched racial and patriarchal hierarchies. The use of a term like "unworthy" to describe Punjabi men reflects how racial ideologies dehumanized them and sought to exclude them from forming relationships that crossed these socially constructed boundaries. The violent response, such as the incident with the shotgun, exemplifies how far society was willing to go to enforce these boundaries, showcasing not just personal prejudice but the systemic enforcement of racial superiority.

    Your discussion also does an excellent job of addressing the lack of agency afforded to women in these dynamics. The societal contempt for darker-skinned individuals extended not only to Punjabi men but also to white women who were vilified for choosing relationships outside their race. This highlights how white supremacy and patriarchy worked together to control women’s autonomy and reinforce the dominance of white men. The example of the clerk refusing to issue a marriage license due to differences in skin color further emphasizes the institutional nature of this racism, showing how personal consent and choice were overridden by societal prejudice.

    Overall, this post effectively ties together the systemic nature of racism and sexism in Western America, illustrating how these ideologies reinforced one another to maintain a rigid social order. By focusing on both the dehumanization of Punjabi men and the restriction of women’s choices, it provides a nuanced understanding of how personal relationships became battlegrounds for broader societal control and exclusion.

  • Pass request

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    8 Views
    No one has replied
  • Requesting a pass

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    7 Views
    No one has replied
  • Norm and non-norm in relationships on the American Frontier

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    5 Views
    No one has replied
  • They're just too different

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    10 Views
    No one has replied
  • Its for your own good that we don’t want you here

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    11 Views
    No one has replied
  • Inter-Cultural Marriages for Fusion Food!!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    7 Views
    No one has replied
  • Always Unwelcomed

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    6 Views
    No one has replied
  • The Luck and Loss of Immigration

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    8 Views
    No one has replied
  • Here we go again...

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    12 Views
    No one has replied
  • The climate of hostility

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    7 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    33 Views
    P

    lmao rofl

  • Marrying out to get in

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    7 Views
    No one has replied
  • "Canadian" audacity (+sodomy!!!)

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    19 Views
    R

    It's interesting that what ultimately commutes Dom Sing's sentence is Verma's angle of Sing's inherent masculinity as given by his marital status, specifically catered towards the Western sensibility. "Verma emphasizes the wife’s ‘‘miserable condition’’ and her ‘‘cries for help’’ because she was without means of male support and would become destitute" (Shah 128). A damsel in distress is conjured to remind the court of Sing's patriarchal responsibilities, that he, too, is an honorable man like any other with a woman/family to provide for. This institution of Christian/moral monogamous heterosexual marriage so inherent to colonialism and white supremacy is used to reinstate the reputation of the non-white man and essentially undermine the white man's dignity in the process.

  • Will My Love Always Be Less Than Yours?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    10 Views
    No one has replied
  • BC is too cold

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    12 Views
    No one has replied
  • Liberation

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    11 Views
    No one has replied