Ugandan Asians - Refugees or just Immigrants?
-
The Ugandan Asians during the expulsion crisis of 1972 shaped various governments approached to their classification and treatment. These individuals were forced out of Uganda under threatening circumstances by Idi Amin’s decree, the Canadian government did not officially consider them refugees according to international definitions. The 1951 UN convention relating to the status of refugees and its 1967 Protocol outline specific criteria for refugee status requiring that individuals be outside their country of nationality and unable or unwilling to return due to a well-founded fear of persecution. And according to the Canadian government, most Ugandan Asians did not meet these conditions because they often held citizenships of other nations, such as Britain, India, Pakistan or Bangladesh, where they could "theoretically" seek refuge. Despite the official standpoint, Canada’s approach to resettlement painted a more subtle picture. The acting high commissioner for Uganda (Reginald Smith) emphasized that Ugandan Asian expellees were not “destitute refugees” but rather desirable immigrants, characterizing the situation as “a windfall for us.” This framing emphasized their educational, entrepreneurial or the skilled backgrounds, suggesting that their resettlement aligned more with an "immigration strategy" than a humanitarian response. Canadian officials recognized the potential contributions of Ugandan Asians and sought to mitigate public fears surrounding unemployment by pointing out that they were unlikely to displace Canadian workers. Many citizens believed that resources should first serve domestic needs, arguing that charity should prioritize Canadian citizens, especially given existing socio-political strains involving French, English, and Indigenous relations. Althoigh Canada accepted and facilitated the resettlement of Ugandan Asians, it did not officially recognize them as refugees. The government’s decision hinged on international refugee law definitions and the availability of other options for the expellees. Instead, they were categorized as immigrants or expellees, stressing their complex legal and social status within Canadian policy and public discourse.