Economic Conditionality for Immigration
-
Canada’s resettlement of Ugandan Asian expellees in 1972 was less a humanitarian triumph than an act of calculated statecraft rooted in capitalist pragmatism. While Trudeau publicly condemned Idi Amin’s racist policies, framing the decision as an extension of Canada’s moral duty, the state’s actions revealed a deeper allegiance to economic interests and the preservation of class structures. Officials explicitly described the expellees as “desirable immigrants” due to their skills and entrepreneurial potential, casting them not as victims of imperialist violence but as effective commodities that could enhance Canada’s labour market (Muhammedi, 89).
This approach reflects Canada’s broader immigration history, shaped by white settler capitalism. Multicultural rhetoric masked the real motivations behind the resettlement: these individuals were welcome not as equal participants in society but as labour and capital generators, ensuring the state’s economic growth without challenging existing power dynamics. Even in extending asylum, the government adhered to the points system to weed out those deemed less economically valuable, reinforcing the commodification of human lives.
At the same time, Canada’s actions must be understood within its colonial framework. The Ugandan Asian expellees were themselves products of British imperialism, first displaced to East Africa to serve as a colonial middle class, then scapegoated during Amin’s regime. Canada’s decision to resettle them wasn’t purely benevolent; it perpetuated the exploitation of migrant labour while sanitising its image as a global humanitarian leader. Though hailed as a triumph of multiculturalism, this resettlement laid bare the contradictions of a capitalist state profiting from displacement while claiming moral high ground.