whiteness and the importance of truth
-
Baldwin and Yancy both argue that whiteness operates as an invisible, yet all-encompassing, normative framework that defines race by rendering itself unseen. This invisibility stems from the pervasive nature of whiteness—it’s everywhere, shaping reality without being acknowledged. Yancy’s repetition of "Look, a white!" disrupts this invisibility, calling attention to the framework that society takes for granted.
For the white man, his identity exists within his whiteness, often without awareness of its implications. The non-white, alienated from this white space due to an ontologically imposed racial stricture, sees what the white man cannot and, in some ways, understands him better.
This notion of orientation, where the norm (whiteness) is formed in contrast to the non-norm (non-whiteness), reveals why white people cannot escape their nature: their history and identity are inextricably tied to those they Other. This helps make sense of Baldwin’s assertion that "the white is the real n___."
Baldwin’s letter to his nephew underscores the importance of truth. Growing up as a racialized minority, whose identity is predetermined by those who don’t know you, is profoundly difficult. To believe that one can simply assimilate into whiteness without consequence may cause more harm than good. Baldwin offers his nephew harsh truths, but with deep compassion. While his nephew is necessarily Black, Baldwin advises him not to orient his Blackness within the dominant white spaces imposed upon him. Instead, his construction of Blackness must come from within. His engagement with the white gaze should be critical and aware—aware of the racialized temporal and spatial landscape laid before him. In this sense, love becomes essential for transcending these external boundaries. One must accept the other's whiteness for what it truly is: a state of being so deeply woven into the fabric of society that those who benefit from it are both trapped by and reliant on its definitions.
The white child is not innocent of racial prejudice; he is simply ignorant. This ignorance, however, does not absolve the consequences of his actions. His gesture, though seemingly innocent, objectifies Fanon and recreates the racializing process within a white space. The child is unaware, but his action carries the full weight of a historical and material legacy of Othering and objectification.
The Kominas’ video illustrates the uncomfortable navigation of racial identity in a majority-white society. Tennis is seen as a white sport, pizza as white food, and indie rock as a white genre. While the Kominas subvert these associations, they also highlight the constraints and pitfalls of assimilation.